The Law on Presumption in Corruption Cases in Malaysia

Authors

  • Rohana Abdul Rahman Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Asmah Laili Yeon Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Zainal Amin Ayub Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Madya Nurretina Ahmad Shariff Universiti Utara Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7719/ijgc.v2i1.298

Keywords:

Social Science, corruption, gratification, presumption, integrity, descriptive design, Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission, Malaysia

Abstract

From a legal perspective, bribery and corruption cases can be unduly complicated and difficult to prove because there is no real victim. In many corruption cases, the prosecution faces hostile or uncooperative witnesses who refuse to assist the prosecution in such cases.  To reduce the complexity of proving that any advantage was given corruptly, the law on presumption of corruption has been incorporated in the old Prevention of Corruption Act 1961, and later in Anti-Corruption Act 1997 and currently the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission Act 2009. There has been mixed reaction from the prosecution and defense lawyers with respect to the law on presumption of corruption in bribery and corruption cases. This paper seeks to highlight the application of the presumption of corruption in certain circumstances as provided in the statute, the right to defend on balance of probability and whether such presumption is contrary to human rights. The paper argues that once statutory presumption of corruption is invoked, it can be challenging to rebut and the burden of proof must remain on the prosecution to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt.  The paper stresses that presumption of corruption is rebuttable if the accused is able to discharge his burden of proving on a balance of probabilities that his receipt of the same was not a gratification.   

Author Biographies

  • Rohana Abdul Rahman, Universiti Utara Malaysia

     Sintok, Malaysia

  • Asmah Laili Yeon, Universiti Utara Malaysia

     Sintok, Malaysia

  • Zainal Amin Ayub, Universiti Utara Malaysia

    Sintok, Malaysia

  • Madya Nurretina Ahmad Shariff, Universiti Utara Malaysia

    Sintok, Malaysia

Downloads

Published

2015-01-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Law on Presumption in Corruption Cases in Malaysia. (2015). International Journal on Graft and Corruption, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7719/ijgc.v2i1.298

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.